Es and aurora to brighten my mood.

My mood has not been so bright lately. The weather has dipped into late Autumn which never makes me feel good. Tropo has pretty well gone and there is a long wait for a good meteor scatter opening. I have been busy with work, yes WORK. Not that work is a total loss as I am sitting beside the radios and the receivers are running. Plus listening to the cricket as well of course.

Also darkening my psychology is that I am soon going to need surgery. My gut has gone out of resonance and needs less capacitance and more resistance. For now it just displays all the non-resonant behaviour we might expect, such as howling harmonic spikes and red hot output stages.

At least after the operation my weight might be less of a problem. They will be taking a bit out, which should help reduce my Body Mass Index.

Pressing on, I managed to work somebody on aurora, and on 2m, and even on CW! On 12 October I worked SM6BFE at 55a, done at a good pace for CW in such conditions. As usual I ignore anyone going to fast, which is most of them.

Also as usual I ignore the "predictions" for Sporadic E made based on the weather, preferring to look to the geomagnetic situation. This is because the predictions based on the weather don't work for me, while ones made on the basis of geomagnetic conditions sometimes do.

The aurora was predicted by the usual means three days earlier and here was the report on Solarham.

Solarham's report on 12 October 2021

Working one station was all I could do as I had to go to the hospital for a scan. But one aurora contact so far this year is one more than last year. At last the new sunspot cycle may be getting going, if slowly.

Solarham was back at it on 16 October saying things would hot up on 18 October and suggested this would last for several days.

Solarham's warning 16 October 2021.

Some Sporadic E results started coming in on 6m on 17 October and they carried on until 20 October.  I did not hear any auroral propagation, but I was happy enough with Es. As is often the case at this time of year the best results were clustered around 12:00. Whilst I have no evidence for this, it seems to me that it takes both peak sun angle plus peak geomagnetic activity to allow some sporadic E. The usual summer double peak of Es does not seem to happen in Autumn and Winter.

50MHz contacts at GM4FVM 17 to 20 October 2021

What resulted was 64 Es QSOs on 6m in October. Why do so many operators not look for Es during the Winter? I did and worked 19 countries with a 2137km ODX. Whatever the points made by those who look to winds in the atmosphere to explain all this, geomagnetic observations predicted it rather well.

We cannot expect these things to occur exactly as planned. There is too much variability in the unstable Earth/Sun magnetic relationship to make it simple. Quite often there appear to be likely events at three days range which turn out to be non-existent on the expected day. There is a lot of space between me and the Sun. It is difficult to predict how launching a pulse of ionised particles fired off a rotating Sun will reach into space as their angle and velocity will affect whether or not they arrive here.

So, will this come to anything?

Solarham warning 29 October 2021.

I will be listening on 6m, 4m and 2m just in case of aurora or Es or even "Auroral Es" - three different possibilities on three different bands. 

Or perhaps I will hear nothing.

This is why I like VHF, you just never know.

73

Jim

GM4FVM

FVM versus the residual current device.

Sorry I have been absent for a while. This has been due to work pressures and a bit of a medical issue which hopefully should be resolved soon.

I have been having a problem keeping my mains electricity on. The mains distribution board was receiving me infinity dB over S9.

When I started using my Tajfun 70cm amplifier I started to have issues with RF tripping protective circuits in various mains circuits. This was not such a big issue, but it really became crucial when it was our own trip that was going. 200W of RF would trip our main residual current device - RCD (also called a ground fault interrupter in foreign parts). This caused me to limit power to 100W on 70cms and think a bit more about it.

I have looked a various websites and I found almost no references to amateurs tripping mains electricity protection circuits. There were a couple of references in the US going back ten years or more, but they affected only one make of device, not a 240V one of course, and not 70cms, so they did not seem relevant.

A few tests proved pretty conclusive. 200W would cause it to trip if beaming that way, and it was instantaneous. If I let the first few moments of transmission pass at low power and then increase the power back to 200W it did not trip. This suggests that there is a spike from the radio (an IC7100) which is momentarily over driving the linear. But, whatever, the RF was clearly tripping the device. Erm, in my view anyway.

I asked a few people who know about mains electricity and they doubted that RF could do such a thing. Nevertheless, I reckoned it was the RF. I just parked the problem as there was plenty going on, and 95W on 70cms seems to be doing all right for me if I stay off moon bounce. The problem is compounded as the beam heading where the moon generally rises passes the point where the RF cuts the mains power. So no EME at high power, with the Tajfun sidelined and my old 95W Microset back in use.

An added point was that as the FVM house is divided into two mains circuits each with its own independent RCD, and only one half was tripping off. As luck would have it, the half which does cut off is not the half powering the shack, so I motor on without being aware that Mrs FVM's machinery (dunno what, I guess sewing machines and irons, plus the TV), has got cut off. This seemed to cause some strife, but I cannot understand why. The radios kept working, so everything seemed pretty well OK to me.

Proteus residual current device at GM4FVM (on the right, others are circuit over current trips)

All went well in the sense that I was ignoring the problem (because people who knew about these things told me I was imagining it), until I renewed my correspondence with Scottish Gas. I might explain that I stopped being a Scottish Gas customer years ago when I transferred my contract to another, cheaper, provider. Generally I was not greatly impressed by their service then. About a decade later I changed my provider again to one called "Robin Hood Energy" hoping that Robin Hood was no longer the ruthless bandit he used to be. Sadly, after three weeks, Robin Hood Energy ceased to be, causing all manner of headaches for the taxpayers of Nottingham City Council, who owned the operation.

This was before the current disaster whereby the UK government has set a maximum price for energy supplied to the public which is lower than the suppliers can buy it for, which not surprisingly is driving many suppliers out of business. Back when Robin Hood went belly-up there was some semblance of order in the market and my account was transferred to another supplier - guess who - Scottish Gas - on existing terms. I got some slight compensation that I still got the same price terms from them as I had been on at Robin Hood, which was a lot cheaper than I could have got from Scottish Gas 3 weeks earlier. So I have two years to enjoy that.

In due course British Gas informed me that my mechanical meter was outdated, liable to be unreliable, and I must change to a new mechanical meter. At the same time Scottish Gas tried to persuade me to change to a "smart meter". This is not a mistake by me, they call themselves British Gas when giving bad news (pay your bill, change your meter) but Scottish Gas when they are giving good news (have a free smart meter, isn't life good?). They are, of course, effectively the same organisation as they are both owned by Centrica. Anyway they said that I need to change it, though it does not seem so long since it was last changed. A smart meter will send readings wirelessly to the supplier meaning I would not need to take manual readings (if it worked ...)

Mechanical meter at GM4FVM, which seemed to be fine to me.

Faced with changing the meter anyway, I opted for a smart meter after news in the RSGB magazine that there was little risk of it causing RFI to my radios. A pleasant chap from Scottish Gas arrived, fitted the new "smart meter" and it promptly tripped the RCD. Many tests, same result. It was clear to me that the RF was to blame, as it had been before. After discussing the possibility of re-fitting the mechanical meter we compromised by his agreeing to temporarily isolate the RF side of the smart meter and promising to return.

Scottish Gas smart meter at GM4FVM, meter on the bottom, "Communications Hub" RF unit on top.

I spoke on the phone to a "bigger man" at Scottish Gas who ran through what he thought might be happening. He still thought that some small earth leakage must be happening which was rendering the RCD liable to trip. As the smart meter is up stream of the RCD it seemed to me to be unlikely that it was earth current which causing the tripping. After all, the smart meter is not in the circuits protected by the RCD (and neither are my radios).

Anyway, I contacted an electrician with a view to having the RCD replaced. He asked for a photo of the RCD and promised to replace it the following week. I never heard from him again.

In order to find a trustworthy electrician I used the tradesman's network instead. I asked a house painter in the village to recommend an electrician. This worked brilliantly. The guy he suggested turned out to be knowledgeable and very willing to change the RCD if I wanted to. However he suggested that I go instead for equipping each circuit in the bank with its own combined current trip and RCD. He would then isolate the old RCD. This seemed like a perfect solution to me because if there is some small earth leakage then I can narrow it down to one circuit and maybe not knock off the TV, which seems to matter more than anything else for some reason. He arrived within days and did the work neatly and cleanly.

New arrangement, separate earth protection on each circuit, main breaker now isolated.

You can see from the photo that the RF Communications Hub unit on the smart meter, the thing that makes it "smart", is right below the distribution board. The inverse square law means it was getting lots of RF from the wireless unit right below. It seems certain to me that it was RF from that unit which was affecting the RCD because now that the RCD is isolated the tripping has stopped. My RF has no effect on the new arrangement at all.

In due course, Scottish Gas returned to turn on the radio or "wireless" side of the smart meter which should have started sending readings to the Scottish Gas system to update my account.

I might add that since the system has been fully activated in smart mode it has has not worked at all. My Scottish Gas (a.k.a. British Gas) account is showing zero readings, so nothing is reaching them. I have activated their app which is designed to work with the smart meter and it shows no readings either. What point a smart meter is which does not relay any information I cannot say.

It cost me £250 to upgrade the distribution board ("fuse board") for half my mains system to allow for a smart meter which doesn't work. On the other hand it is not RF sensitive. Next task no doubt is to replace the other half for another £250, though it has been no trouble --- yet.

My Granny always told me to avoid people who change their name depending on what suits them. I thought she meant rogues, vagabonds, or the Duke of Rothesay. I now know it applies to British Gas and Scottish Gas too.

Grrr.

73

Jim

GM4FVM